– Uma Privada de Ouro ao invés de um Van Gogh para Trump?

Eu pensei que era alguma trolagem, mas não era! O presidente Donald Trump pediu um quadro de Van Gogh ao Museu Guggenheim. Só que seu pedido não foi atendido, e como alternativa, foi oferecido uma obra escultural de Maurizio Cattelan: um vaso sanitário de ouro!

Olha só, do Washington Post: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/the-white-house-wanted-a-van-gogh-the-guggenheim-offered-a-used-solid-gold-toilet/2018/01/25/38d574fc-0154-11e8-bb03-722769454f82_story.html?utm_term=.b93e5c75c777

THE WHITE HOUSE ASKED TO BORROW A VAN GOGH. THE GUGGENHEIM OFFERED A GOLD TOILET INSTEAD.

The emailed response from the Guggenheim’s chief curator to the White House was polite but firm: The museum could not accommodate a request to borrow a painting by Vincent van Gogh for President and Melania Trump’s private living quarters.

Instead, wrote the curator, Nancy Spector, another piece was available, one that was nothing like “Landscape With Snow,” the 1888 van Gogh rendering of a man in a black hat walking along a path in Arles, France, with his dog.

The curator’s alternative: an 18-karat, fully functioning, solid gold toilet — an interactive work titled “America” that critics have described as pointed satire aimed at the excess of wealth in this country.

For a year, the Guggenheim had exhibited “America” — the creation of contemporary artist Maurizio Cattelan — in a public restroom on the museum’s fifth floor for visitors to use.

But the exhibit was over and the toilet was available “should the President and First Lady have any interest in installing it in the White House,” Spector wrote in an email obtained by The Washington Post.

The artist “would like to offer it to the White House for a long-term loan,” wrote Spector, who has been critical of Trump. “It is, of course, extremely valuable and somewhat fragile, but we would provide all the instructions for its installation and care.”

Sarah Eaton, a Guggenheim spokeswoman, confirmed that Spector wrote the email Sept. 15 to Donna Hayashi Smith of the White House’s Office of the Curator. Spector, who has worked in various capacities at the museum for 29 years, was unavailable to talk about her offer, Eaton said.

The White House did not respond to inquiries about the matter.

Cattelan, reached by phone in New York, referred questions about the toilet to the Guggenheim, saying with a chuckle, “It’s a very delicate subject.” Asked to explain the meaning of his creation and why he offered it to the Trumps, he said: “What’s the point of our life? Everything seems absurd until we die and then it makes sense.”

He declined to reveal the cost of the gold it took to create “America,” though it has been estimated to have been more than $1 million.

“I don’t want to be rude. I have to go,” the artist said, before hanging up.

It is common for presidents and first ladies to borrow major works of art to decorate the Oval Office, the first family’s residence and various rooms at the White House. The Smithsonian loaned the Kennedys a Eugène Delacroix painting, “The Smoker.” The Obamas preferred abstract art, choosing works by Mark Rothko and Jasper Johns.

On the face of it, President Trump might appreciate an artist’s rendering of a gilded toilet, given his well-documented history of installing gold-plated fixtures in his residences, his properties and even his airplane. But the president is also a self-described germaphobe, and it’s an open question whether he would accept a previously used toilet, 18-karat or otherwise.

Cattelan’s “America” caused something of a sensation after the Guggenheim unveiled it in 2016, drawing more than a few headlines.

“WE’RE NO. 1! (And No. 2)” was the New York Post’s front-page offering, the huge lettering over a photograph of the toilet. The tabloid’s coverage included a reporter’s first-person account (“I rode the Guggenheim’s golden throne”) and a photograph of that reporter seated on the toilet (reading the New York Post, naturally).

“More than one hundred thousand people” had “waited patiently in line for the opportunity to commune with art and with nature,” Spector wrote in a Guggenheim blog post last year. The museum posted a uniformed security guard outside the bathroom. Every 15 minutes or so, a crew would arrive with specially chosen wipes to clean the gold.

Cattelan, 57, is well known in the art world for his satirical and provocative creations, including a sculpture depicting Pope John Paul II lying on the ground after being hit by a meteorite. Another was a child-size sculpture of an adult Adolf Hitler, kneeling. The artist’s works have sold for millions of dollars.

Cattelan has resisted interpreting his work, telling interviewers he would leave that to his audience. He conceived of the gold toilet before Trump’s candidacy, though he has acknowledged that he might have been influenced by the mogul’s almost unavoidable place in American culture.

“It was probably in the air,” he told a Guggenheim blogger in 2016 as “America” went on display.

Cattelan has also suggested that he had in mind the wealth that permeates aspects of society, describing the golden toilet “as 1 percent art for the 99 percent.”

“Whatever you eat, a $200 lunch or a $2 hot dog, the results are the same, toilet-wise,” he has said.

Cattelan is not the first artist to immortalize a bathroom fixture. In 1917, Marcel Duchamp, the French dadaist, unveiled “Fountain,” a porcelain urinal that was rejected when he initially submitted it for exhibition. A replica is owned by the Tate galleries in London.

At the Guggenheim, when Cattelan raised the notion of a gold toilet in mid-2015, Spector embraced the idea and got approval from the museum’s director, Richard Armstrong. Asked whether Armstrong supported the curator’s offer of the toilet to the White House, the Guggenheim’s spokeswoman replied, “We have nothing further to add.”

Spector, in blog posts and on social media, has made plain her political leanings.

“This must be the first day of our revolution to take back our beloved country from hatred, racism, and intolerance,” the curator wrote on Instagram a day after Trump’s election in 2016. Her post was accompanied by a Robert Mapplethorpe photo of a frayed American flag.

“Don’t mourn, organize,” she wrote.

In August, as Cattelan’s “America” was approaching its final weeks on display at the museum, Spector wrote on the Guggenheim blog that Trump had “resonated so loudly” during the sculpture’s time at the museum. She described his term as having been “marked by scandal and defined by the deliberate rollback of countless civil liberties, in addition to climate-change denial that puts our planet in peril.”

A month later, the curator crafted her response to the White House’s request for van Gogh’s “Landscape With Snow.” She explained that the painting — “prohibited from travel except for the rarest of occasions” — was on its way to be exhibited at the Guggenheim’s museum in Bilbao, Spain, and then would return to New York “for the foreseeable future.”

“Fortuitously,” Spector wrote, Cattelan’s “America” was available after having been “installed in one of our public restrooms for all to use in a wonderful act of generosity.”

She included with the email a photograph of the toilet “for your reference.”

“We are sorry not to be able to accommodate your original request,” the curator concluded, “but remain hopeful that this special offer may be of interest.”

bomba.jpg

– Uma 3a Guerra Mundial por conta das Coréias?

Não, não teremos uma Guerra Mundial aos moldes das duas anteriores em breve. Teremos um conflito localizado entre Coréias do Norte e do Sul, atingindo Japão e EUA, por conta de Washington, Seul e Pyongyang. Entretanto, com a atual tecnologia armamentista, as proporções de catástrofes são maiores. O Mundo não estará participando ativamente da Guerra, mas sofrerá consequências econômicas por isso.

Uma bomba atômica norte-coreana, já possível, seria considerada “pouco potente”. Porém, nos dias atuais, esse ‘pouco potente” equivale a 8 vezes o poderio da que foi lançada em Hiroshima. Imaginem só as muito potentes dos Estados Unidos o que podem fazer…

Uma pena que nesse imbróglio não serão o jovem ditador enlouquecido Kim e o milionário turrão Trump que lutarão e sairão machucados, mas sim os inocentes comandados por eles.

bomba.jpg

– Uma MOAB americana lançada no Afeganistão

Donaldo Trump não está brincando em serviço.

Sempre ouvi que, para movimentar a economia local, uma guerra seria importante para os EUA, movimentando a indústria bélica e repondo estoques de armas.

Pois bem: eis que nessa semana os americanos lançaram a “mãe de todas as Bombas”, chamada de MOAB, a bomba mais poderosa não nuclear já fabricada.

Extraído de : notícias.uol.com.br

EUA LANÇAM PELA PRIMEIRA VEZ SUA BOMBA NÃO NUCLEAR MAIS POTENTE.

Os Estados Unidos usaram nesta quinta-feira (13), pela primeira vez em um conflito, sua maior bomba não-nuclear, a chamada ” mãe de todas as bombas”, ao lançá-la contra um complexo de túneis do Estado Islâmico (EI) na província de Nangarhar, no Afeganistão, informou o Pentágono.

Pela primeira vez, os americanos utilizaram a bomba GBU-43 Massive Ordnance Air Blast (MOAB), um gigantesco projétil de 10 toneladas, criado para destruir complexos de cavernas e túneis subterrâneos.

O lançamento, normalmente feito por um Hércules C130, foi anunciado poucas horas depois de acontecer no distrito de Achin às 19h32 (horário local, 12h02 de Brasília), uma rapidez pouca habitual em operações deste tipo.

A província de Nangarhar, no leste afegão e perto da fronteira com Paquistão, é a remota região na qual os jihadistas do EI se assentaram para estender sua presença na que chamam província de Khorasan (parte de seu autodeclarado califado).

“O bombardeio foi pensado para minimizar o risco para as forças afegãs e americanas que realizam operações sobre o terreno nessa área, ao mesmo tempo que maximiza a destruição de combatentes e instalações do EI-Khorasan”, explicou o Pentágono em um comunicado.

“Esta é a munição adequada para reduzir os obstáculos e manter o ritmo da ofensiva contra o EI-Khorasan”, acrescentou o general John W. Nicholson, comandante das forças americanas no Afeganistão, que lembrou que os jihadistas estiveram trabalhando em defesas subterrâneas e bunkers.

O uso da “Mãe de todas as bombas”, que mata com a imponente pressão de ar que gera, indicaria que a área estava amplamente ocupada por operativos e instalações do EI, sem evidente presença civil.

O Pentágono assegurou hoje que “foram tomadas as precauções para evitar vítimas civis”, apesar de o projétil, que é guiado ao alvo apenas durante a queda, não ser considerada de precisão.

Além disso, o uso deste projétil é uma mensagem de combate clara para o EI e serve de amostra ao mundo do poderio militar americano.

Segundo a emissora “CNN”, o Pentágono enviou drones de reconhecimento e está utilizando satélites para quantificar o dano e resultado do lançamento da bomba.

bomba.jpg

– O que EUA e Coréia do Norte farão?

Donald Trump não quer papo com a Coréia do Norte e ameaça o ditador Kim Jong-un. Ele, por sua vez, promete uma surpresa onde os jornalistas não deverão levar nem “isqueiros” (palavra dele).

O mundo volta a correr risco de destruição, de ver inocentes mortos e com sequências catastróficas por conta de poderosos bem armados?

Meu Deus…

bomba.jpg

– Você acredita que Trump resolverá a paz no mundo com a força das armas?

Ao ver as repercussões negativas dos mísseis lançados pelos EUA na Síria, e a movimentação de turcos, chineses e principalmente Putin, o todo-poderoso da Rússia, fico pensando: a guerra se resolverá com mais guerra?

Se alguém falar que sim (e muitos dirão ser um mal necessário), por quê não criar uma força de paz multinacional comandada pela ONU para assegurar a garantia de estabilidade na região?

bomba.jpg